IMAGINE TWO GUYS LOCKED IN BRAZILIAN JIU-JITSU FLOOR WORK, ONE ON TOP, ONE ON THE BOTTOM WITH EACH IN AN ATTEMPT TO SUBMIT THE OTHER WITH IMPENETRABLE HOLDS...ARE THESE GLADIATOR CONTEST:
ooo!..that's a trick question!..well, it's both, or it can be anyway...if we were in Ancient Greece, for example, it would probably be the same thing, as this was a time before the distinction between homosexual and heterosexual was made, Sex between fighting men, warriors, gladiators, was commonplace...it was 'normal'..combat is a turn-on, there is no doubt about that. From personal experience, sex after wrestling is errr, hahahaha! wow! mind blowing!...male aggression is normal, it's natural, to deny it is to deprive ourselves of a beautiful and untamed aspect of masculinity. Trouble is, to many people are equating 'aggression' with 'violence', NO, NO, NO, they are not the same thing at all! If anything I would say that violence comes as a result of denying aggression and masculinity. it's fucked up. Anyway, where the bleedin' hell was i? oh yeah, men, combat and sex... homosocial needn't be homosexual, but it's perfectly natural if that's how it ends up...Heroic Homosex http://www.heroichomosex.org/ i don't necessarily agree with everything here, but it answered a few of my questions... i've rambled again..well you did ask! ;-)
It's both because they in many ways are one and the same. You know there was a time when the winner could brutally fuck the loser in full view and at the pleaser and demand of the crowd. Man. I wish we could have that today.
I think its Homo-erotic
ReplyDeleteooo!..that's a trick question!..well, it's both, or it can be anyway...if we were in Ancient Greece, for example, it would probably be the same thing, as this was a time before the distinction between homosexual and heterosexual was made, Sex between fighting men, warriors, gladiators, was commonplace...it was 'normal'..combat is a turn-on, there is no doubt about that. From personal experience, sex after wrestling is errr, hahahaha! wow! mind blowing!...male aggression is normal, it's natural, to deny it is to deprive ourselves of a beautiful and untamed aspect of masculinity. Trouble is, to many people are equating 'aggression' with 'violence', NO, NO, NO, they are not the same thing at all! If anything I would say that violence comes as a result of denying aggression and masculinity. it's fucked up. Anyway, where the bleedin' hell was i? oh yeah, men, combat and sex... homosocial needn't be homosexual, but it's perfectly natural if that's how it ends up...Heroic Homosex http://www.heroichomosex.org/ i don't necessarily agree with everything here, but it answered a few of my questions... i've rambled again..well you did ask! ;-)
ReplyDeleteIt's both because they in many ways are one and the same. You know there was a time when the winner could brutally fuck the loser in full view and at the pleaser and demand of the crowd. Man. I wish we could have that today.
ReplyDeleteBOTH...... simple.....
ReplyDeletefor men - fighting and fucking are almost the same thing.....
Initially, my reply to your question is erotic. The visual arouses me. Hey, I'm a homo and I get turned on! I'm honest and I admit the fact.
ReplyDeleteUpon retrospect, as long as the result (possible physical intimacy) is consenual and safe is it acceptable.
HERSHEY'S KISS - I WONDER WHY THAT IS...HMMM?
ReplyDeleteRUSTY - THANKS FOR THE LINKS GUY!
ReplyDeleteTHAWICKEDONE - WISHED WE COULD STILL HAVE THAT TODAY!
ReplyDeleteDAMIEN - SO VERY TRUE!
ReplyDeleteROGER - IT IS VERY EROTIC TO SAY THE LEAST!
ReplyDeleteI think it is Homo-Erotic more so than Homo-Social.
ReplyDeleteCHET - SOUNDS LIKE YOU GET ALL THE WAY OFF!!!
ReplyDelete